| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Sep | Nov » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
- 13. March 2010: Census and Sensibility (Part II)
- 13. March 2010: Census and Sensibility
- 2. March 2010: It Was Never About Your Health
- 2. March 2010: Is The Government A Rights Supplier?
- 21. February 2010: The Economic Traffic Jam
- 16. February 2010: Congressional Gains May Be Smaller If Dems Are Right
- 12. February 2010: Why Not Nullification?
- 9. February 2010: First Amendment Idiots (I can say that, can’t I?)
- 3. February 2010: No Judicial Activism Here...
- 22. November 2009: Boy, Is Our Face Red
Blogroll
McCain Misses the Point (again..)
In Wednesday night’s debate, Obama opened himself up on taxes again and John McCain refused to take the opening. Once again Obama has spoken proudly about taxing the rich, but also added that he would give tax breaks to businesses that create jobs in the United States.
Let’s assume for a moment that you are a business owner. You can either keep your jobs overseas and avoid the ridiculously high tax rate in America, or you can create jobs here, pay the taxes up front, and collect on the back end. Hmmm, money in the bank, or money in the government’s hands??? Tough decision.
John McCain should be pointing out that ANY tax on business will end up coming out of the pockets of working Americans. If a business pays higher taxes, they are going to pass on that higher tax to you. Some will eliminate jobs to save money.
It is clear that never having a real job has seriously affected Obamination’s ideas about how a free-market economy actually works.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.