| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Sep | Nov » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
- 13. March 2010: Census and Sensibility (Part II)
- 13. March 2010: Census and Sensibility
- 2. March 2010: It Was Never About Your Health
- 2. March 2010: Is The Government A Rights Supplier?
- 21. February 2010: The Economic Traffic Jam
- 16. February 2010: Congressional Gains May Be Smaller If Dems Are Right
- 12. February 2010: Why Not Nullification?
- 9. February 2010: First Amendment Idiots (I can say that, can’t I?)
- 3. February 2010: No Judicial Activism Here...
- 22. November 2009: Boy, Is Our Face Red
Blogroll
Guilt By Association(s)
Barack Obamination wants us to believe that his 20-year long attendance at Jeremiah Wright’s sermons means nothing. (Other than what a fine church-going Christian he is)
He also expects us to believe that starting his Senatorial campaign in William “cop-killa” Ayers’ living room is devoid of significance as well.
If he had so little to do with these people, why does he refer to Ayers as a “Professor Of English” instead of “despicable murdering piece of garbage”? Why does he wait 20 years to suddenly notice that Race-baiter Wright is saying a few things out of line? Was he afraid of hurting their feelings?
The answer is simple, and visible to anyone not blinded by fanatacism: he had no disagreement with these disgusting anti-American pieces of subhuman slime.
Personally, I find Obama’s association with his wife disturbing enough not to vote for him. Anyone who can ignore the others is more interested in nurturing their senseless hatred of Republicans than in the “Truth” that Obamination claims to love.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.